The ITC recently issued an order denying Respondents’ request to use the Early Disposition Program because issues regarding ownership of the asserted patents raised in the request would require third party discovery and were too complex to be resolved within 100 days.
In a recently issued Initial Determination, ALJ McNamara ruled that beer containers imported into the U.S. satisfied the domestic industry requirement because the Complainants were able to show significant domestic value-add with the use of expert testimony.
Circumstantial Evidence Can Help You Satisfy The Importation Requirement…But Only Under The Right Circumstances
In a recent summary determination order, ALJ Bullock found that complainants cannot always rely on circumstantial evidence to satisfy the Section 337 importation requirement because, without actual importation records, such evidence may not be sufficient to prove that a respondent actually shipped an infringing product.
In a recently issued Commission Opinion, the ITC affirmed the ALJ’s finding that asserted claims directed to a road paving machine with an adjustable screed assembly were invalid as directed to an abstract idea.
In a recent order issued in the Northern District of Texas, Judge Godbey denied a Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion despite the Federal Circuit’s holding that the asserted patent was invalid as indefinite. He reasoned new evidence not presented on the ITC record may alter a term’s claim construction and, as a result, the asserted patent’s validity.