Commission to Weigh in on IPR Estoppel

Commission to Weigh in on IPR Estoppel

The Commission has determined to review an initial determination finding that Respondent Ford is estopped under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) from asserting certain invalidity defenses previously adjudicated by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding.  Certain Hybrid Electric Vehicles And Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1042, Notice (Dec. 8, 2017).  The underlying initial determination raises nuanced issues regarding the application of IPR estoppel in Section 337 investigations.

When Is It Too Late to Amend an ITC Complaint?

When Is It Too Late to Amend an ITC Complaint?

In a recent order, Administrative Law Judge McNamara denied Complainants Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies ULC’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint to assert U.S. Patent Nos. 8,760,454 and 9,582,846 against Respondent VIZIO, Inc.  Certain Graphic Systems, Components Thereof, And Consumer Products Containing The Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1044, Order 32.

ITC Remains Unpersuaded by Final PTAB Rulings

ITC Remains Unpersuaded by Final PTAB Rulings

This week the ITC stood firm in its position that final PTAB rulings of unpatentability in IPR proceedings are not grounds to modify, suspend, or rescind remedial orders.  In Certain Foam Footwear, Inv. No. 337-TA-567, the ITC issued a short order denying a petition for such relief.  In the Order, the ITC cited its precedent in Certain Network Devices, Related Software and Components (II), Inv. No. 337-TA-945, Order (Sept. 11, 2017) which we discussed here.

Federal Circuit Stay Order Demonstrates Value of Redesign as Defense in ITC Actions

Federal Circuit Stay Order Demonstrates Value of Redesign as Defense in ITC Actions

The Federal Circuit has determined to partially stay an ITC exclusion order as it pertains to products redesigned after the remedial orders issued.  We have previously posted about Certain Network Devices, Related Software and Components Thereof (II); Inv. No. 337-TA-745 and the ITC’s refusal to stay its remedial orders after the Patent Trial and Appeal Board found the asserted patents unpatentable in an IPR proceeding.  Respondent Arista has had better luck in the Federal Circuit obtaining a stay of the remedial orders for its redesigned products.